My friends, in most Catholic and Christian churches today, except for ours,  you would hear that we are celebrating the feast of, “Christ the King.”  Here, we name this feast, Jesus, the Christ, our Brother and Friend, and we do that for a definitive reason – Jesus never claimed to be a “king” and never wanted that title.  This Church feast is, in fact, just 100 years old this year! 

   Pope Pius XI, in 1925, established this feast as he felt that Catholics were forgetting about Jesus and that this feast would re-establish his place in our lives.  It is too bad that the emphasis was in “Jesus’ power over us” rather than uplifting his life and encouraging us humans to “walk in his footsteps.” 

   So, as always, let’s look at the Scriptures.  Each selection today speaks in one way or another about what the people, in the times of the book of Samuel in the Old Testament, Paul in the New Testament, and in the gospel of Luke would expect from a would-be king or leader. 

   In the 1^st reading from Samuel, the people come to David, their would-be king and ruler and tell him that he will “shepherd” them – an interesting take and connection to David’s earlier occupation of “shepherd to the sheep” – now he will “shepherd” people.  The peoples’ response is “Here we are” [!]

   As an aside, in the early days of Roman Catholic Women Priests ordinations, many of us, me included, placed the words, “Here we are,” on banners, and added, “We are ready” as our statement of faith in what God was doing within us. 

   These words, “Here we are” seem appropriate today, indicating that in response to our baptisms, not only are “we here,” but that, “we are ready” to do our part.

   As we think about David and his call, “to shepherd” his people, we realize another of the reasons for using the right, perhaps more correct names for our leaders.  There is the human tendency to, “take power,” if we are given it, and “run with it,” forgetting “why” this power was entrusted to us in the 1^st place.  If we recall the story of David, we remember that he forgot “to shepherd,” for a time, and opted for “reigning,” as in “king,” instead, until he once again found his way. 

   It is interesting in this light, to consider the term, “reverend,” a term that many priests, both male and female use as a title.  “Reverend” comes from the Latin, reverendus, meaning [one who is] to be revered/must be respected.  For me, it seems that, just because “one is ordained,” doesn’t mean they should automatically, “be respected,”  but rather, by their actions. 

   And for that reason, I use the title, “pastor,” as it continuallly reminds me, to try “to pastor” folks, not “rule them.”  A small example to this point is of a newly ordained male back a few years ago who told me that he “demanded” that his parishioners call him, “Father” – it always struck me that his stance of “demanding,” was all wrong. 

   The second reading from Paul to the Colossians shows us his relationship to Jesus, as, “the Christ” – as this was the only way Paul knew Jesus, as they had never met as humans, one to the other.  If we reflect on “the Christ” as theologians and Franciscans, Sister Ilia Delio and Father Richard Rohr speak of Jesus, we realize, “this” Christ is a “big enough” God for all believers, “a Cosmic Christ,” yet Paul’s understanding is more narrow –Paul’s “Christ” is one who came “to save us from our sins” “through Jesus’ death on the cross,” as he speaks of it in today’s 2^nd reading, as if that was the only reason for Jesus becoming human.  We know today from modern exegesis that in one sense, Jesus did “come to save us,” but, in a larger sense, “from ourselves,” by showing us, “the way” to live and to love. 

   In Luke’s gospel selection for today, it is clear that the soldiers ridiculing Jesus as he dies, didn’t understand either why he came.  Interestingly though, one of the men dying alongside him did! “This one has done nothing wrong” [as he spoke of Jesus’ earthly life of justice, mercy, compassion and love for us humans.

   The fact is, though, what he said about Jesus is not entirely true—that “Jesus had done nothing wrong.”  In the eyes of the powers-that-were in Jesus’ time—he had done plenty wrong! Jesus was advocating that the leaders deal out justice for all, especially the least among them, and criticizing them for not being the “servants” that true kings and leaders should be.  The only way to silence such a one, or so they thought, was the punishment that Jesus was suffering. 

   So, my friends, if we are to be true followers of our brother Jesus, then we cannot get caught up in the theology “that God sent Jesus to die for our sins.”  If we stay there, then Jesus “does” it all—there is nothing for us to do, but live, without ever questioning, never looking at ourselves, never taking the responsibility for our own actions and doing our part. 

   Jesus came to show us how to live our human experience in the best way.  Sometimes that may get us into trouble, as it did Jesus, but we are expected as his followers to get out into our world, in the midst of the sometimes mess we find there, as in our present time, and to do our part to make things better.  Jesuit and social activist in the 1980s, Dan Berrigan, was known to have said,  “If you want to follow Jesus, you better look good on wood!” 

   In conclusion then, let’s home in on Jesus’ true mission for each of us—anything that isn’t ultimately about attempting to be our best through kindness, mercy, and justice for all, including ourselves—basically about love, should not be wasting our time.  And you will notice that I included, “ourselves,” as we can’t be there for others if we forget ourselves. It’s a balance.

   So, also as we said last week in concluding another, Year of Grace, this “being a Christian” isn’t easy – it will at times call us to some hard decisions, most likely, not “crucifixion,” but sometimes standing alone, even among family and friends.  But we must remember that we have strong shoulders to stand on in our brother and friend, Jesus, the Christ!” Amen? Amen!