Homily – 2nd Sunday of Easter

   My friends, it was Easter Friday during the 1st week of Easter, as I wrote this. Additionally, I received an on-line Easter greeting from a friend who almost always sends me one after the actual holiday or holyday.  As I reflect on that, I realize, and she probably did too, that the wonderful sentiments that Easter conveys, or any other special day for that matter, are big enough, and important enough to extend to more than one day. My mother-by-marriage, Margaret, used to say, “We can celebrate our birthdays for a whole week,” when we didn’t get together on someone’s actual special day. 

   So, what am I saying with regard to the Easter Season?  Benedictine Sister, Joan Chittister has said of Easter, “It is not a nice, fairytale with a happy ending—it is just the beginning.”

   I think to put all of this in perspective, let’s review what happened in Jesus’ life journey after he died on the cross—the state punishment for one who wouldn’t remain silent in the face of injustice to many in Church and State. 

   Jesus’ followers from over the three years of his very public life had, we could say, lost a great deal of hope in their rabbi who they sincerely thought to be their “messiah,” and even though Jesus foretold his death, they couldn’t actually believe that it would come to pass.

   They had seen him cure many, raise Lazarus from the dead— “why,” in their humanity, they asked, “couldn’t he save himself?” They had never before seen the likes of such a teacher-revealer-friend, so it makes sense that they simply couldn’t imagine such a one as Jesus, who would become, the Christ, the “anointed one.”

   So after the Sabbath, these 1st followers’ level of hope got a real boost when the women went to his tomb to anoint his body, and found that had, “gone missing.”  Now, not yet understanding what Jesus’ foretelling of the fact that, “he would rise again” truly meant, they assumed, some of them, that his body had been stolen. 

   You may have wondered reading the account from John’s gospel on Easter, of Peter and John going to inspect the tomb after Mary Magdala reported that Jesus was not there, why it mattered “that the body wrappings and the face covering were in different places” in the tomb.  What John, in his gospel is saying to his readers, is what he personally, “saw,” [and came] “to believe” –Jesus had risen, just as he said, because if someone had actually, “stolen his body,” they wouldn’t have unwrapped it first!  John wants everyone reading his account to know what he came to know—Jesus had truly risen! 

   And additionally, we all, reading through the longer account of that 1st Easter morning, come to know and hopefully believe that “rising from the dead” is quite different than being “resuscitated,” as was Lazarus.  Easter morning let those 1st believers know that what Jesus experienced in the resurrection –something promised to each of us one day, was, and would be different.

   We know this because the risen Jesus was unrecognizable to his closest friends and followers—Mary Magdala and the travelers on the way to Emmaus, who only knew him when he “spoke and acted” in ways that they recognized from when he had been physically present to them.

   At this point friends, I think it is important to actually try and place ourselves into this awesome experience that Jesus’ 1st followers, Scripture tells us, were involved in.  In doing that, we can excuse perhaps, any unbelief, or lack of seeming, understanding of what was going on, because after all, what we have come to believe, in our faith, after hearing this story every year of our lives, these 1st followers were experiencing for the very first time!

    Today then, in John’s gospel, we really shouldn’t be so hard on Thomas for not believing—he was perhaps a very “pragmatic” person who simply, “needed to physically see,” to believe.  Mary Magdala and those who journeyed to Emmaus, along with all the other apostles had experienced the “risen Jesus” in a way that they couldn’t explain, which helped them to believe.  The telling then, over the centuries, of this awesome story has helped all of us to believe. 

   Pondering then the other Scripture selections for this 2nd Sunday of Easter, we see that as Joan Chittister said of Easter, “this is just the beginning.”  Our part then, as for all of Jesus’ followers is to walk in his footsteps, doing in our world, what he did in his. 

   In the reading from Acts, we are told that, “the community of believers was of one “mind and heart,” thus from the very beginning, we should know that for each of us, both, “mind and heart” will be needed “to be” in our world as Jesus was in his.  Luke, thought-to-be writer of Acts continues, “all [in this community of believers] were given great respect,” and that “no one was needy among them.” Think my friends, how it would be if more in our world, treated “all with respect” and that we shared to the point that “no one was needy.”

   In the second reading from John’s 1st letter, he says, “the love of God consists of this, that we keep God’s commandments,” and here we see that balance, or at least mention of the importance of “mind and heart” –is not always an easy undertaking.  It has been said, “Love is the hardest lesson.”  Additionally, John, in his 1st letter has a consul for those who would perhaps enforce the “commandments”— [that they] “are not burdensome.”

   In today’s gospel, another line that jumps out for me, that Jesus utters often when he appears after the resurrection, is one that we should make part of our own lives, as we too engage with others— “Peace be with you!” It would seem that this phrase, whether we use these exact words or not, would be the balance between acting on law, versus acting with love. 

   Within this gospel, our brother Jesus gives the Church its “marching orders” so to speak, in being open to the, “Spirit continually renewing the face of the earth: “Whose sins you retain, or forgive,” it is done!”  I believe what Jesus is basically saying here is that we should engage not only our minds, but more so, and at least with equal measure, our hearts— “do what you feel, in your heart, is right,” I believe Jesus is saying.  Again, not to be redundant, Bishop Barron’s response to our parish’s request for a visit, is devoid of heart.

   This past week our Church lost a prophet in the person of Bishop Tom Gumbleton. He said of himself that in his justice actions in our world for peace, for equality, and more, “he never thought about consequences,” and that is probably why he never attained more than “auxiliary” bishop, which came to him at age 38. Our Church, unfortunately, doesn’t promote prophets. 

   In conclusion then, earlier I mentioned the words from John’s 1st letter that “love of God consists of…keeping God’s commandments,” and Jesus made that easy for us when he said, there are really only two you need keep— “Love God and your neighbor as yourself.”  It sounds simple, but anyone, including the first community of believers that formed after the resurrection came to know, it is not always “simple,” nor is it, “easy.”  Our salvation friends is in knowing that our brother Jesus has not only shown us “the way,” but stands with us as we strive to engage heart and mind in living as he did.  Amen? —Amen! —Alleluia!

Homily – Easter Sunday

My friends, one of the two Eucharistic Prayers that I use, speaks to the beauty of all creation, and names humankind as the pinnacle of all created life.  Not so long ago, one of you questioned whether we should have such a hierarchy of created life when really humankind is just a part of that. I found this comment most compelling to the point that now when I pray this Eucharistic Prayer, as I will today, I eliminate the hierarchy and pray our gratefulness for all of creation, in all its parts and forms, because together we share a symbioses that makes life “work” for all of creation. 

   As you all know, Robert and I were away these past two weeks cruising the Amazon River and into the Caribbean with Viking.  One of the things that they do really well is to bring historians, and other expert speakers on board to give “cruisers” a fuller picture of the people, land, culture and more, of the places visited. One such individual was an Englishman, Bernard Purrier.  He gave us much to think about in several presentations, but one example that I’d like to share, fits particularly well here, and makes the point that we humans shouldn’t hold ourselves in such high esteem as compared to the rest of creation.

   This was a presentation on whales and dolphins and their fine abilities to know where they are in the water as their eyesight isn’t that great. Because both are mammals, we could say, in a general way, that they are our sisters and brothers.  They also are very intelligent.  Bernard gave us a wonderful example showing their very keen intelligence and sense of caring typical of female dolphins. It apparently has been recorded that female dolphins can sense the heartbeat of a human fetus within its mother’s womb when the woman is in the water and will move to protect this human “sister” from harm.  So then, what does this have to do with Easter Sunday you might be thinking.

   Our brother Jesus came into history over 2,000 years ago to show us how to live, to love, to die, and one day—like him, to pass on—to rise to a new life.  And precisely here is the connection between what Jesus came to do and much of what we experienced on our trip—through speakers, local guides, and our own experiences visiting many new places in our beautiful world. We had a cruise director, Jenna who ended each of her daily presentations explaining the opportunities for the following day that we could choose from by saying, “Whatever you do, live your best life!” 

   Our loving God, my friends, wants the same for us, to live our lives well, striving to be our best, for ourselves and for others, thus sending our brother Jesus as a model for us to follow.  For too long, hundreds of years in fact, before “windows and doors were opened” at the Second Vatican Council, we Catholics were stuck, much like the Jews, in the time of Jesus, adhering to copious, crippling rules and regulations designed by “religious” men whose main concern, it would seem, was to keep people in line by frightening them into submission over the thought of one day meeting a vengeful God who would judge them. 

    The Second Vatican Council poured fresh air into our beloved Church reminding us of just how much our God, did, in fact LOVE us, and we came to know this through our brother Jesus who spoke of our God as a loving parent who welcomed the “prodigal” back, and about a shepherd who left the 99 in search of one that was lost.

   With Vatican Council II, gone was the old story of a mean-spirited God who sent Jesus to die for our sins—and this Council encouraged us all to break out, and away from of this tiny-boxed God, and begin to hear anew, through Jesus, how much each of us is loved.  What the story of Jesus is really all about is his encouragement to be our best selves—to grow beyond our human inclinations to think small, to be safe—to be like the status-quo, and to instead, become people who can see the wonder and the good in all people, all races, all genders, no genders, all religious expressions, and all human manifestations of love—one for another, without excluding and dividing, saying who is welcome, who is not. 

   I was again saddened to see our Bishop Barron’s take on the monumental work of the Second Vatican Council in basically denouncing Jesus’ call that, “we are all one,” by stating this type of inclusion is making our Church, “nicey-nice,” or that Pope Francis is, “dumbing down the Church” in doing the same. 

   We must remember my friends; Good Friday was really all about an attempt to silence someone (Jesus) for not remaining silent in the face of injustice in both Church and State.  We may look at the torture of crucifixion and think, how barbaric, but the same kind of torture can be done in more than physical ways for not being silent in the face of injustice. 

   Our bishop’s statement that, “he will not waste his time until we (AAO) come back to the Church,” is, in my mind, a “crucifixion” of the heart, and is against everything that our brother Jesus stands for. 

   So, my friends, my intent here was to move beyond a traditional Easter Sunday homily to basically say that the reason for our Alleluias today is because Jesus did break, “out of the box,” saying, what you are doing here is just not enough! Whenever you do not see me in any person you meet, when you fail to care for our world and all its creatures, when you basically place law above love, you have failed in being my follower. But the great thing with Jesus, with our God, is we can always have another chance.

   In conclusion then, my friends, I will talk more about the Easter Scriptures in the upcoming weeks, but for today, I wanted to uplift for us the beauty of the longer version of today’s Gospel from John. The key players, besides Jesus are John, Peter, and Mary Magdala. They each, on some level, knew that Jesus would “rise from the dead”—at least they had heard him say that he would.  They wanted to believe but they had no idea what “resurrection” meant. And it is only in this longer version that we basically learn that someone who has experienced resurrection will not appear the same.  In this longer version of the gospel, Mary Magdala did not know Jesus when she met him in the garden.  It was only when he said her name, “Mary” in the way that only he would say it, did she know him! —doing something that was familiar. 

   From this one example friends, we will know others, they will know us, and they will see Jesus, when they see us acting with love in our world, just as he did in his. Amen? Amen! Alleluia!

Homily – 4th Sunday in Lent

My friends, as I said in this week’s bulletin, two lines, especially, stood out for me—the 1st from Ephesians, serving as our 2nd reading today, “We are God’s work of art, created in Christ Jesus to do the good things God created us to do…” The 2nd one from 2 Chronicles, our 1st reading today, comes from Cyrus, the leader of the Persians, who set the Israelites free after the Exile, with the words, “You can go home again.”

   Now, it won’t be any surprise to you that I am suggesting that each of us go deeper with these two lines.  For many of our combined years, “cradle-Catholics,” most of us, Lent has been a time, wherein we have nearly, “wallowed in,” “good ole Catholic guilt.”  The 1st reading today from 2 Chronicles could add to the personal feelings that many of us may have had about our “worthlessness,” and feelings that we just can’t ever, “get it right”—mea culpa, mea culpa, striking our breasts, if it weren’t for the saving lines of Cyrus, that, “yes,” “we can go home again[!]”

   Again, this is why I always say, “go deeper” to unearth the message our loving God wants us to get.  Perhaps, we can look at this 1st reading as an “attention-getter” to simply realize that in our humanity, we are imperfect and make mistakes, for any number of reasons; we are tired, ill, upset, selfish, lazy—whatever it may be, but for me, the greater part of this reading (going deeper) is the message of hope that Cyrus not only gives to the People of God coming out of exile, but to us today, is that we too, “can go home again!”

   John’s gospel selection for this Sunday lets us know, in Jesus’ words, that “God sent him into the world to save us,” (that good ole Catholic guilt) that I mentioned earlier, and told us that Jesus “needed” to die that horrible death on the cross, to save us as reparation for our sins.  Think of how that paints God in most of our minds!

   How about if we reframe this picture.  If as we read in the letter to the Ephesians, “we are God’s work of art,” wouldn’t it make more sense to think that God wanted to give us, “a little bit extra help” in living out our imperfect human lives, by sending us, “a northern star,” so to speak, in our brother Jesus, to show us the way to be our best selves –as opposed to a vindictive God who “needed” someone to suffer for the imperfections of humanity?

   I always have to wonder why our hierarchical Church fathers insist on holding up during Lent our “sinfulness” as opposed to our “merciful” God who “chases after us” all the days of our lives, as written so beautifully in the translation from The Message of the 23rd Psalm.  The negative message does much to “enslave” us while the positive message is all about, “setting us free” to discover that indeed, “we are God’s work of art,” capable of so much good in our world. 

   And, as I look around our world, there seems to be so much that needs our love and care.  Yes, we may be “imperfect” creatures, but we aren’t incapable of making a difference in our world.  You all are aware that March is, Women’s History Month. February was, Black History Month.  Have you ever thought why we have these two month-long celebrations?  Or better yet, why we don’t have a Men’s History Month?

   Racism and sexism are two of our national sins, and when you think about it, we are only touching the “tip of the iceberg” in month-long celebrations of the wonderful accomplishments over time, of both groups, often made little of, or nothing at all.

   Friends, we live in a patriarchal world and Church, that second-guesses” the abilities of blacks and women that in the cases of whites and men, are uplifted.  If we want to talk about “sin” in our Church, here is one, where women are concerned! 

   So much my friends that is labeled, “undoable” in our world and Church is not about an “inability” to do the thing that is needed, but about “power and control” –think about it!

   Those with the power, for whatever reason, don’t want to share it, and how, we might ask, does that square with a God who created us, “works of art,” “to do the good things [that same God] “created us to do?”

   In the beginning of this homily, I spoke about the negative notion that we have often gotten concerning Lent—heavy on “repenting.”  It is good to consider that the word “return,” as in, “you can go home again,” and “repent” come from the same Greek word.  Perhaps we might concentrate in these last weeks of Lent more on “returning” to our loving God, if by our actions, we have “been away,” knowing that “we will find mercy,” to begin once again, to be our best selves, and be “enabled” to do all that we were created to do. Amen? Amen!

Homily – 3rd Sunday of Lent

My friends, our lives as Christians, as followers of our brother Jesus, continually call us to face our daily lives with eyes and ears open to truly be able to see and hear all that is going on around us, especially wherein “justice for all is concerned,” because this is what Jesus was about in his life, thus showing us the way. 

   Our first reading today, you probably noticed, lays out for us the 10 Commandments given to Moses on Mount Sinai.  In a general way, we could say, these ten are about being good toward all.  Additionally, we hear that we should, “Let love and respect for others, ourselves and God be central in our lives” –it would seem then that all else that is good will follow. 

   I often tell you and remind myself as well, that Jesus came to show us “the way,” to live our one, wonderful life to the best of our ability—in other words, to become our best selves.  And why would God, in Jesus have decided to do this, we might ask?  Because of love, plain and simple.  Our God who is always watching over us, rejoicing with us in our joys, sorrowing with us in our sorrows, our down times, never interfering in what we choose to do within the gift of our free wills, saw that our free choices weren’t always the best for others or ourselves, and thus came to be one-with-us as a model that we could follow. 

   Paul, in the second reading from 1st Corinthians says that he and his followers, “are preaching a messiah nailed to a cross,” that, “God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger than human strength. 

   Now if we were looking for a paradox, we wouldn’t have to go further than these statements, which we can’t read literally, because the true message lies deeper.  Again, we must realize that, as Father Richard Rohr has said, Jesus’ becoming one-with-us to die was never Plan A!  Jesus came to LIVE, and to LOVE, showing us the way—his death was the result of how he had lived! The powers-that-were in his time simply did not want the equality and justice for all that he was proclaiming, as it tapped into their power and control.  The same can be said for our Church hierarchy today in their refusal to accept the God-given calls of women to be ordained to the priesthood. At the end of the day, it is about losing their power and control over the message. Bishop Barron, here in Winona has said through his secretary, in a call we made asking to speak with him, “that he won’t waste his time talking with us unless we are willing to return to the Church!”

   Jesus’ actions in the Temple, recorded in John’s gospel today, signaled, as a colleague of mine said, “the end of business as usual for those who had eyes to see and ears to hear.”  Coming to the Temple on yearly pilgrimage, as ritual and praise of a God who had been faithful to them, had along the way lost its true purpose—those in power had made the “holy sight,” a market place and Jesus was calling them to task for it.  We can only imagine the anger these same religious officials felt toward Jesus’ actions, as in their heart of hearts, knowing he was speaking the truth!

   It seems that many times, Jesus’ message is lost on the powers-that-be, but he keeps trying to draw them in, to help them see that what they do at the Temple is only the starting point for their relationship with their God. They keep getting lost in “wanting a sign,” and when he gives them one, it is much easier for them to stay on the surface, as in the gospel today, rather than pondering a deeper meaning, choosing instead to ridicule him. 

   So, my friends, again if we truly want to follow our brother Jesus, we too may find that it will demand that we, like him, will have to disrupt the “easy-going” of some in the places of power in order that all others might have a fair shake at a basic, good life.

   Jesus “was aware of what was in their hearts,” the gospel said, and likewise, of what is in ours too. And with that knowledge, he is always calling us to go deeper, to see beyond our personal needs and wants, to what many others can only dream of in this world. 

   Jesus is always calling us back as two of our hymns speak of today, to as someone said, “the heart of the message,” or as I always say, to go deeper.  Paul in his letter to the Corinthians today takes us to that deeper place.  Paul begins with that paradoxical line, “We are preaching a Messiah nailed to a cross.”  To Jesus’ first followers and probably most of the Jewish people living when he did, who awaited a “messiah,” did not imagine the messiah that their brother Jesus became.  Their image was very literal—the Messiah they awaited would conquer their present-day enemies—the Romans, and set them humanly, free.  This reminds me of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict today.  The Jesus I know, if he came today, as a messiah to the Israelis would not be accepted as such by them either, as he would call them to peace, not conflict.

   With acceptance of this knowledge, Paul’s next words make more sense and bring understanding, “God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom.” For when did war and conflict ever bring permanent and lasting peace?  I am reminded of the words and sentiments of Angelo Roncalli, Good Pope John, who often throughout his short papacy prayed and advocated for peace.

   Paul continues, “God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.”  To many, Jesus’ first followers included, the cross seemed like “weakness,” but only time would show that not to be the case. 

   On Friday last, in Russia, a patriot, prophet, and truth-teller, in the person of Alexei Navalny was buried and his strong life for others celebrated.  No doubt, his murder, as that of our brother Jesus, was intended by the powers-that-be to silence both men, but the “foolishness” is that it didn’t for Jesus, nor will it for Navalny—the message will only grow. 

   The life of Francis of Assisi is often spoken of, as the “foolishness of God,” and his memory lives on strong and true 800+ years after his earthly life in countless followers, men, and women alike.  Which brings to mind once again the case for women’s ordination in our beloved Church. The powers-that-be have excommunicated all of us responding to what we know is God’s call for us, thinking it will end there, only to show once more the “foolishness” and ultimate strength of our God which is stronger than any human strength wanting to tear it down.

   So my friends, as we continue through Lent, let us open ears, eyes, hearts and minds, to hear and see and feel the love that our good God has for us, not in sending Jesus to die, but in sending him to live, to love, and to show us how to do the same, how to ultimately become our best selves. Lent is such a good time to ask if we are truly “tuned-in” to our radical Messiah! Amen? Amen!
 

Homily – 2nd Sunday of Lent

My friends, let’s jump right in today tackling that 1st reading from Genesis that on face value, is simply horrible—at least the beginning! As I always suggest, we must go deeper.  And we need to go deeper because in the 2nd reading from Romans, we hear Paul say, “If God is for us, who can be against us?” Additionally, in the gospel reading from Mark, we hear our impetuous brother Peter exclaim, “How wonderful it is for us to be here!”  So, how are we to fit this all together?

   Now, the hierarchy within our Church that put these three readings together probably didn’t have as much trouble uniting the three as the common folk with children do because their theology comes from the head alone, instead of from the heart as well.  For them, connecting this reading of sacrificing Isaac to show faith in a seemingly, unfeeling god is not a problem, but is united in their belief that our God sent Jesus as a sacrificial offering for the sins of humankind.  I even picked up a bit of a reflection on TV for this Sunday from a male priest, inviting folks to listen to his message today, and he was saying the same about Jesus coming to save us from our sins. 

   Present day theologians, men and women of the likes of Ilia Delio, Richard Rohr, Sandra Schneiders, and John Shelby Spong, all deny that this cruel sending and mission was given to our brother, Jesus, by our loving God, the same God that Jesus often referred to as Abba—Loving Parent, Daddy, Mommy, as you may want to look at it. 

   Also important in understanding this 1st reading is remembering that the Jewish people up until this time were used to the ritual offering/killing of their own. But even with that understanding, I personally find it hard to understand a “Loving Parent” choosing to sacrifice their own children. The grief shown us almost nightly on the news from Ukrainian parents, from the innocent Palestinian and Israeli parents confronted with the deaths of their children is proof of this.

   Now, if it is the consequences of how someone lived and acted in the world, then I can understand it more.  This past week, we had a present-day example of this in the murder of Alexei Navalny in a Russian prison camp for speaking against the totalitarian regime of Vladimir Putin.  Our brother Jesus continues to die in our world, over and over again in those who challenge, as he did, injustice anywhere in our world, paying the price for that action.  We need to see anew the Eucharistic “presence” here, in the present, in the suffering, poor and rejected, instead of spending our energies worshipping Jesus’ presence on Catholic altars, alone, apart from the world where Jesus told us we would find him.

   So, once we get past that horrible first part of the Genesis reading, understanding it a bit more in the cultural, ritual context, we can move on to the good piece of this reading that does indeed unite it to the other two readings for this Sunday.  “I will make your descendants as many as the stars in heaven and as many as the grains of sand on the seashore.”  This line speaks volumes about a God who loves us in an over-the-top way! And I think it was ultimately written to tell us that our God doesn’t want such ritual killings, but instead, our living to be our best, for others and for ourselves. 

It says that this loving God wants us to have a human experience that is alive and well and full with family, not one who needs the life of our children in payment for our imperfections, or as a sign of our faith. 

   If the true nature of our God was in this negative vein, then how could Paul in his letter to the Romans speak this lovely line— “if God is for us, who can be against us?” He could speak this line because Jesus had already come, lived, loved, and showed us how to do the same. 

   Jesus’ life was such that as is recorded in today’s gospel from Mark, Abba God spoke through the clouds of transfiguration that [Jesus] “is my Beloved, my Own, [and that the apostles, ourselves included should] listen to [him]” –be like him! 

   Mark’s gospel today also included the lovely line from Peter, “how wonderful it is for us to be here[!]” Now, we could discount this comment as “impetuous” on the part of Peter, or we could consider it as a challenge to ourselves, living in a world that so needs people who will look for the good, proclaim it as such in other people, animals, plants—all of creation really, and do all that we can to make life and existence all that it can be.

   So friends, I started out today lamenting the 1st reading and its mis-guided connection to the mission of Jesus in the Incarnation.  I believe this is a prime example of how, when we read Scripture very literally, we miss the depth of the message. 

   For us to see Jesus’ coming as no more than “saving us from our sins,” as reparation to a mean-spirited god who made us “imperfect,” which means that, we will probably “sin,” is as Shakespeare said in one of his plays, “Much ado about nothing.” And while this theme isn’t about “nothing,” I would say it certainly is about the wrong theme!

In truth, for the hierarchy of the Church, to make Jesus’ coming and ultimately, his death, all about “reparation for our sins” is to short-change our Loving God, who doesn’t want to control us as the hierarchy does, but wants us to be our best, living out our human experience for ourselves and others.  Such a God wants me, wants you, to proclaim with Paul, “If God is for us, who can be against,” and with Peter, “how wonderful it is for us to be here [!]” Much to do friends—let’s be about it!  Amen? Amen!