My friends, as promised, today and the next several Sundays will be, big picture, about the “body and blood of Christ,” and it is important, thinking about the “big picture,” that when we speak of “Christ,” we don’t mean Jesus’ last name, but a concept that Franciscans, Ilia Delio and Richard Rohr, as well as other expansive thinkers, of the ilk of Diamuid O’Murcho in Quantum Theology, speak of as inclusive of all peoples, times, and places—in other words, Christ is for all. 

   So, my friends, the chosen readings for today are so good in that they indeed tell us how to receive Jesus’ body and blood, and what to do with it once received.  I believe these readings do tell us how to get out of the small boxes that our Church hierarchy have been, sadly, famous for putting us into. 

   The 1^st reading from 2 Kings gives us the prophet Elisha telling “a giver of bread” –20 loaves, to, “give it to the people.”  As we humans tend to do, we see the “small picture,” as the giver of the loaves says, “How can I serve it to 100 people?” 

   Likewise, in today’s gospel from John, we see the same phenomenon—too little food, too many people.  The prophets Elisha, and Jesus simply say, “Give it to the people.”  And miraculously, in both cases, while not enough to start with, there are leftovers!  So, what can we make of this?  Clearly, something beyond physics is going on…

   Psalm 145 gives us an initial clue:  “You open your hand and [you will] satisfy.”  It has been said by others that the small offering given, in both readings, became great because of the example given by one person that encouraged others to give what they had too when they saw that there wasn’t enough to go around. Or, one can simply believe that the “blessings” of the prophets, Elisha and Jesus, miraculously multiplied the loaves, and in Jesus’ case, the fish, to make not only enough, but more than enough. 

   I personally like the idea that both Elisha and Jesus initially, “showed the way” and others responded in kind…  Jesus, in my read of Scriptures was always “showing the way” to be our best selves. 

   Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, our 2^nd reading, fleshes out beautifully I believe, just how we are to be “our best” in our earthly existence:  He says, “I plead with you then…to lead a life worthy of your calling…” basically, treat others charitably, with unselfishness, gentleness, patience—doing all you can to preserve unity. 

   It seems then, that there is always the chance that when we “give what, as Saint Francis of Assisi said, is ours to give,” there is the possibility that more will be added to our gift by others.  We should never underestimate our personal power in this regard, to start the ball rolling, so to speak.  At the very least, we have the responsibility to, “show up,” –the Spirit will probably take it from there. 

   So my friends, we can’t really speak about the “body and blood of Christ” in the Eucharist without mentioning the extravaganza, to the tune of $28 million held by the hierarchy of our Church, in Indianapolis last weekend.  To be fair to our Winona/Rochester diocesan bishop, Robert Barron, I felt I had better listen to what he had to say at the Eucharistic Congress. 

   Bishop Barron is definitely what some would call, “a charismatic individual,” which can be a good, or not so good thing, and people needing perhaps, a strong message, are very much attracted to him—they in fact, love him, and his words. 

   In his talk he spoke about what is wrong in our world, and to him, it is that “love is not being addressed, or applied.”  He told those gathered that they need to be, “Lumen gentium,” light of the world, only he doesn’t ever say what that means. He does say in so many words that we as individuals have no right to, “listen to ourselves,” or act on our own desires—that is God’s to do—to tell us who we are, and how we should act, and interestingly enough, “God’s message” is exactly what the hierarchical Church teaches.  What was, as a good friend of mine says, “crazy-making,” to me, was his dialog about “not listening to our egos” –only his persistence on doing things by the rules and regs (his way, in fact), without any thought about listening to our own beings, made him sound quite egotistical, and arrogant, something he, I am sure, is totally unaware of.  I am always a little skeptical of someone who is so sure that they have the absolute truth. I always thought that God gifted us with free wills—but not so, it would seem in listening to Bishop Barron. 

   So, the more that I listen to him, the more I know quite clearly, why he won’t come and speak with us…

   But going back to his notion that what is wrong with the world is that, “love is not being applied, “ I would ask him, if that is the case, why does he never speak about, nor  encourage his followers to address climate change (talk about Word/World on Fire), poverty and hunger in our world, ceaseless wars, nuclear proliferation, the death penalty, acceptance of those who have struggled to live within the narrow confinements of gender okayed by the Church hierarchy, God’s equal calls to women and men to serve at our liturgical tables—to full leadership in our Church.  In my mind, it’s because he doesn’t understand the profound nature, and expansiveness of love as depicted by our brother Jesus.

   In conclusion then, Bishop Barron’s Word on Fire, that he hopes to ignite within his following, and spread throughout the world, I would say will not have the massive effect that he hopes for because it clearly, in my mind, is not about “love” in the grandest sense of the word.  It has no direction beyond its narrow scope of what is acceptable –it is exclusive, arrogant and small-minded. 

   I say “small-minded” because in its attempt to have us all spend our creative minds and energies merely accepting that “the bread and the wine of communion is human flesh and human blood,” rather than what Jesus’ body and blood transformed in us is doing, or should be doing in our world, extending acceptance, kindness, open ears and hearts, hearing individual and unique things our God is doing in the world, seems to me to have missed the point! Truly, I would say that when, “the Word, is truly on Fire, people will keep finding more and more ways, not less, different nuances of what love means.  And let me be clear, I am not saying that followers of this movement are not doing “good” things in this world, as I know they are, but if we are about love, in the memory of Jesus of Nazareth, then, no one can be excluded, everyone is worthy, and certainly, not, “a waste of time,” as Bishop Barron said of us! Amen? Amen!

   My friends, once again we come to celebrate in our time a woman, Mary the Tower—formally known as Mary, from an obscure town—Magdala.  True exegesis done in our time tells us that in fact there is no town of “Magdala,” and that is because the word, “magdala” is not a place, but an adjective for a woman maligned throughout our religious Christian history in order to keep her in a place where her call and mission, given by our brother Jesus would remain little known to the world going forward.

   “Magdala” in fact, in Aramaic, means “tower” and was given to Mary as testament to her “tower of faith.”  In our past celebrations of Mary Magdala, we have uncovered the recent work of women scholars demonstrating the tampering done with Scriptural texts by bishops, popes, and perhaps others to combine all the “Marys” in Scripture stories minus Jesus’ mother, into a composite labeling them in the person of Mary from the supposed town of Magdala as a prostitute, rather than her true identity of prophet and priest. 

   There is evidence as well that the persons and actions of Mary and Martha, usually connected with Lazarus, as one family, being switched over time and the words in Scripture voiced by Martha, after Lazarus’ raising from the dead by Jesus, proclaiming him, “the Christ,” were really Mary’s, the one who would go on to form a house church after Jesus’ earthly life. 

   We must remember that Mary’s words are the same ones uttered by Peter which ultimately christens him, “the Rock.”  And if Mary’s words are essentially the same, then we have a problem as the men establish the Church going forward—unfortunately for women claiming their God-given calls to ministry, our beloved Church was founded on Peter the Rock instead of Mary the Tower of Faith.  My friends, this is what happens when Scripture texts are, as Sister Sandra Schneiders says, “written by men, about men and for men!”

   In our past Mary Magdala liturgies I have quoted chapter and verse where changes were made over time and if you haven’t been here at a time when I did that, and would like to know more, I can supply them to you—it is quite a tangled web…

   This year, because there is so much happening in Indianapolis this week around two very different Church views on the gift and meaning of the Eucharist, I thought it would be good to use the selected Church readings for the 16^th Weekend in Ordinary Time to be in line as much as possible with the Church of us all. The readings as such have much to say to us about what the Eucharist truly is, in light of the prophets of old, including Jesus, and his desire of how we should minister in our world. 

   Let’s begin with Jeremiah, prophet in Old Testament times who speaks our God’s words: “Woe to the shepherds who are destroying and scattering the sheep of my pasture!”  Most, if not all of us, are not “shepherds who care for sheep,” but Jeremiah was speaking to folks who were shepherds, so this was most meaningful to them.  The transition is easy enough for us to assign the prophets words to “leaders” in our own time.

   Our “supposed” Catholic leaders, bishops from across the country are meeting in Indianapolis this week, along with 50,000 devoted Catholics, for a 5-day event costing $28 million, wherein they are hoping to revive the Catholic church through an exaggerated presentation of the “Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist,” with the special emphasis on this presence being actual flesh and blood. 

   They are being “hard-pressed” to justify this expenditure which includes a special monstrance (no doubt quite spendy as all Church religious articles tend to be) to house the sacred elements, when little attention, or any “real” deep concern seems to be spent on healing the thousands of victims of clergy sex abuse—this Body of Christ—this real presence has never received a true and sincere apology for the tremendous damage done to so many, and if that were truly seen as one of the most pressing activities that they as leaders need to do, I believe they might see more people in the pews, and it would not cost $28 million to do!”  “Woe to you shepherds…destroying and scattering the sheep in my pasture, the prophet proclaims today! 

   That same prophet also speaks these words of God” [Our God wants all of us] “to be fruitful and multiply.” 

   Indianapolis this weekend is also the sight of the “Eucharist of Equals,” sponsored by Roman Catholic Women Priests who are inviting those who attend to a wider, more expansive view of Eucharist, the one I believe is much more representative of how Jesus, our brother, envisioned this final gift to his followers. 

   At this liturgy and the liturgies of women priests across our country, and around the world, everyone who wants to be with us, and pray with us, is welcome to be there—no exceptions!  Our brother Jesus took his “liturgy” to the hillsides because everyone wasn’t welcome in the synagogue!  Unfortunately, with the Church men,

there are always “disclaimers and barriers” to their message.  The event at the Lucas Oil Convention Center (a curious place to hold this event it would seem) costs $300-350 to attend, not counting travel, food, and housing expenses, not something most, if any of the poor and disadvantaged could attend.

   One of the themes being uplifted by the women this weekend is of course “equality in ministry” –women too are called, and who are these so-called male “leaders” in our Church, to say, “women are not?”

   Looking at the other two readings for this weekend, we see more of the true nature and message of our brother Jesus.  Knowing himself how hard and physically, emotionally and spiritually draining, ministry can be, Jesus , in his compassion wants to take his apostles away for a time of rest, Mark tells us in today’s gospel.  The time of rest doesn’t happen in this story, but yet the counsel from Jesus to do so is there. 

   Paul’s letter to the Ephesians lets us know that “the Christ,” the only reality that Paul ever knew of Jesus, [will] “bring us all together.”

   I would say that in light of two very different views of Eucharist being presented in Indianapolis this weekend, it will be most important that we keep our eyes open, fully focused on Jesus’ actions and then he can more easily, “bring us all together.” As one of the banners that the women will be holding this weekend when they demonstrate outside of the Lucas Oil Convention Center says so well, “Jesus asks us to imitate, not adore him.” 

   So then my friends, we come back to one of the main themes of today’s liturgy—affording Mary Magdala, Tower of Faith, her true place in our struggle to be faithful witnesses to Jesus’ profound message of love and care for our world and all its many people in so many different stripes and colors.  Many women in our Church are already doing this—we aren’t waiting for the men to say it is okay! Amen? Amen!

   My friends, we shouldn’t be surprised that once again this week we hear the theme of being a “prophet,” as it is really part and parcel of being a follower of our brother Jesus.  Coupled with this theme to prophesy, is the most comforting, additional theme of a God who loves us mightily. 

   I will begin with this second theme of a “loving God” who wants only good for us as this knowledge of such a God gives us the strength to be prophets, when we might otherwise walk away from such a task.

   This desire of our God that we would strive to be our best is laid out beautifully by Paul in today’s 2^nd reading from Ephesians. He says, “God [wants] us to be holy and blameless—full of love.” It must be said that striving after such qualities in our lives will no doubt help us to become our best. 

   Paul continues, saying that [as] “adopted children…we were willed an inheritance.”  As we consider this fact of being “adopted,” it is good to reflect that as of July 1^st  of this year, in Minnesota, and many other states, birth records have become fully available to adopted children.  Even though many adopted children are interested in those records mainly to know their “origins” for medical purposes and perhaps, curiosity, many will say that even after coming to know their original stories and coming to understanding about why they may have been “given up,”  they continue to call their “adoptive parents” their “true” parents as they were the ones who raised, and loved them into adulthood. 

   Thus, it is from this most positive view of adoption, that I invite us to ponder our God’s gift of love to us, and an inheritance of eternal life one day.  Additionally, let us consider that, contrary to ages-old Church teaching that this Loving God sent our brother Jesus to make reparation for the sins of us all, our Loving God did rather, send Jesus to show us the “best ways” to live our lives, to make sure that our human experiences here led us back to God—as such was God’s love for each of us. 

   One of those “best ways” then, was that each of us, as Jesus’ followers, would shoulder the mission/the call to be a prophet in the times and places of our lives, just as he did in his.  Amos, like many other prophets doesn’t claim to be a prophet, thinking wrongly that this task belongs to others—he is only “a shepherd” after all. 

   We can perhaps say the same; I am only a teacher, a farmer, a mother/father, an ordinary laborer, and so on—who am I to prophesy?  And our God through Amos seems to be saying, “Who are you not to!”

   This then causes us to look at just what prophets are being asked to do.  The fact that a simple shepherd is being asked to speak, “God’s truth” says that the “call” comes to the lowliest among us, and on up the ladder, in their own way —where each lives and works.

   We have already established through Amos’ call that “being a prophet” is not something that folks generally seek out.  Our brother Jesus understands, most likely from his own human journey, that there is “fear and apprehension” in this call to sometimes “stand alone” in speaking the truth given by God. Perhaps this is why many choose not to speak their God-given truth.  But Jesus sends his faithful followers out in twos that they might support one another. 

    I was called upon this past week to accompany a friend, driving her to an appointment for a procedure in Lacrosse, and bringing her back again.  She mentioned several times, before and after her procedure, “I am so glad that you were with me!” 

   Mark tells us today in the gospel story of the apostles being “sent out in twos”—“they cast out demons and anointed many people with oil, and healed them.”  “Anointing people with oil,” speaks to a “priestly function,” which we might feel would disqualify some of us, but as we know from Jesus’ teachings, we must always go deeper in these readings, finding that there are many ways “to anoint and heal,” –through touch and kind, supportive words, through simply “being with another in their pain,” and so on. 

   In today’s gospel, Jesus wisely shares with his followers then, and now, that indeed, “this being a prophet” won’t always be easy! He tells us that we may have to “shake off the dust,” we encounter along the way, which would seem to align with what we heard last week, that we aren’t ultimately responsible that our words cause others to change, but we are responsible for at least speaking the words given us by God. 

   Another of the fine-tuning pieces that we need to see in today’s gospel is that Jesus is telling the apostles to preach “repentance of sin” as they went from town to town.  We have often heard in years past the emphasis of Jesus’ “forgiving our sins,” as opposed to “repentance” on our parts.  The two often, for Jesus, went hand in hand, “Your sins are forgiven—go now, and sin no more—or in other words, “be better –try not to do this again, which really speaks to our God’s desire that we try to be our best. If we stop at “God’s forgiveness” instead of our, “repentance” too, it is all on God, without any effort on our parts. Jesus was wise enough to know that we, and others in our world would be better if we “repented” our wrong-doing, vowing to be better. 

   We can probably sum up these thoughts today by thinking of how we operate in our own lives when we need help from others in accomplishing tasks in our lives.  Most, if not all of us turn to others that we know and trust, perhaps even love, to help us do what needs to be done. Our God does the same in asking us to be “prophets” in our own times and places.  No matter where we live, work, or share life with others, we are the best people, there, to speak God’s truth! Amen? Amen!

My friends, it would seem that even on a surface level this week, “being a prophet” is  the issue we are called to ponder.  I like the word, “ponder” as it suggests we are looking at any issue in more than a surface way. 

   As always, let’s look to today’s Scriptures to see what this means in our everyday lives.  The prophet Ezekiel in the 1^st reading today doesn’t seem to have a very pleasing task given him by God’s Spirit.  We learn in this short reading from chapter 2 that the people have been, “rebellious, defiant, and stubborn”—not encouraging words as a “potential prophet” enters in.  And additionally, we learn another interesting thing about being a prophet—it is not as important that the people change their ways as it is that the “prophet speaks.” 

   Thus, the onus is not completely on the prophet to get people to in effect, “be better,”  but on the people themselves.  At the very least Scripture says, “they will know that a prophet has come among them.” 

   I believe it is good as we reflect on this passage, as well as on the 2^nd reading from Corinthians with Paul, and the Gospel from Mark with Jesus, to try and put ourselves in their places to understand, and appreciate what it truly means, “to be a prophet,” because as followers of our brother Jesus, we each are called to the same.  By spending time with each of these three prophets, Ezekiel, Paul, and Jesus, we realize that we are in “good company” first off, and we are able to find “our way” perhaps in acting likewise.

   We can only imagine that for each, a certain bit of “fear: was present, and perhaps some “reluctance,” to be “the one,” to speak out—there would be some who would believe, and others who would not.  Having others “believe and be accepting of” what we say that is perhaps new, even challenging can be a “heady thing,” and one has to always work toward a balance in “speaking the truth,” and letting that “ability” go to our heads. 

   There was the possible danger of that happening to Paul as he was given a [so-called] “thorn in his side” to keep that tendency in check.  Paul asked God to remove the “thorn” on several occasions, only to be told, “my grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness.” And it would seem that as Paul persevered in his call, “to be a prophet,” he learned a powerful lesson, saying, “when I am powerless, it is then that I am strong.” 

   I know personally, as I reflect on the privilege of pastoring this parish, that I am subject too, in my humanity, to letting it all “go to my head.”  Over the years, I have said to Robert, “If you ever see me becoming proud, pompous, and arrogant, please stop me!”

   This week we probably get our best advice, and counsel on the “gift of prophecy” from our brother Jesus. We see him “going home,” and finding more rejection than acceptance, saying to his apostles and disciples, then and now, “prophets [have] honor, except in their hometown and among their own relatives…”  Such was the case with me and my ordination—more who didn’t really know me were supportive, than those who did; some family members, and close friends were, as for Jesus, “stumbling blocks,” as I was, probably, in ways for them—“you are upsetting the applecart,” as we say in a more colloquial fashion—I was doing something, “out of the ordinary,” the status quo, something the Church fathers hadn’t sanctioned, and at that point, family and friendly connections for some didn’t matter—the law did.

   So my friends, as we ponder these Scriptures that really encourage us to be “prophets” in our world; a world that so needs those who will call a lie, a lie when they hear it, will challenge injustice when it is so blatant in minority groups of people, and who will simply strive every day, “to be their best,” even when there are few to model that behavior for them.

   I mentioned a few Sundays ago that I am reading a new book about Jimmy Carter, entitled, His Very Best.  Author Jonathan Alter no doubt named his work after a personal work by Carter, in his long life, entitled, in question form, Why Not the Best?

   This question for Carter came originally in his Navy days with a superior officer who asked him if, “he had done his best?” on a particular project, to which Carter answered, “No.”  His superior asked, “Why Not?”  Carter, it seems, has worked on his answer for the rest of his long life after, and I would guess will continue working on this challenge, “to be his best,” with whatever time he has remaining. 

   I have in the past addressed the Church’s Season of Ordinary Time, saying that it should perhaps be called, “Extra-Ordinary Time” because of all the challenge the Scriptures hold for us during these many weeks. And what I have come to these last years is that the “ordinary” things that each of us is called to “every” day of our Christian lives is the same challenge that Ezekiel, Paul and Jesus had in their lives; “to stand up, stand out, to be top-of-the-line—a real cutting edge!”

   As we look at our world, both in Church and State, we unfortunately don’t see much that is “cutting edge,” but more that I would humbly suggest are being, “stumbling blocks.”  Thus, we can’t wait for the “powers-that-be” in either Church or State, but must humbly speak our truth when called to do so, and this will be different for each of us.

   And if we aren’t always sure where to start, we can turn to Jesus’ words with the counsel, “check the fruits”—if you see peace, justice, and well-being happening—join in! If not, and the world picture looks full of distrust, chaos, self-centeredness, and injustice, speak from your hearts the truth that you hold there.  It has been said, “the heart is wiser than the head.”  And finally, when all is said and done, realize that like Ezekiel, you are not responsible for the ultimate change in people—but you are responsible for speaking the truth you know—perhaps your “speaking out” will plant a seed that will grow later—but again, you are responsible to do this much at least! Amen?  Amen!

My friends, as we continue on in Ordinary Time, a good place it seems to start today is with the Wisdom writer who said, in the 1^st reading that, [we] “are modeled [each of us] on the divine.”  That seems to go along well with the writer, whose name I am forgetting, who said, “We are spiritual people here, having a human experience.” 

   The idea that we “are modeled after the divine” is not just a “static” fact, but one that comes with a responsibility to strive to be our best.  The Wisdom writer goes on to say that “God created all things to be alive —[everything] is meant to be wholesome,” and additionally that, “justice lasts forever.”

   Now, if it is true that, “justice lasts forever,” and that our brother Jesus, came to “show us the way,” it would seem that part of our responsibility as his followers would be to have an awareness of the times and places where “justice isn’t equally given out in the lives of others, and this, by the way, includes ourselves!  Sometimes in our zeal to help others live a better life, we forget about ourselves.  This is often the case in the lives of many women who tend for the most part to be the givers/helpers in society, not often remembering themselves. 

   Paul, in his letter to the Corinthians in the 2^nd reading today, speaks about what really needs to be a “balancing” act in our lives. He quotes Scripture saying, “the one who gathered much had no excess, and the one who gathered little did not go short.”  In perhaps more simple language we could say, “at present, I have a surplus, and I need to, as a follower of Jesus, view that against another’s present need” –one day the surplus may belong to another, and I may be in need, with the hope that others will share with me! 

   Earlier, I spoke of women not always remembering to include themselves in the equation of “giving to others.”  Jesus, in today’s Gospel selection from Mark addresses this issue through the lives of two females.  It’s important from the get-go that we be aware that neither Jairus’ daughter, nor the woman with the unusual blood flow are named—the same is often true in other stories where children of either sex are spoken of—neither women, girls or boys had any standing in the culture in which Jesus lived and ministered, so why name them was probably the thought. 

   Next, let’s look at how Jesus handles each situation:  In a general way, wherever he finds injustice, his natural response seems to be, “to heal” –to bring understanding, compassion, and love. 

   In the case of the little, unnamed girl, Jesus hears with compassion the pain of her father, as he asks Jesus to heal her.  Jesus, I believe, is also trying to address our human tendency, to see the “glass half-empty” as opposed to “half-full.”  When the attendant arrives to say that “the little girl has died,” Jesus counters this with, “she is only sleeping.” 

   On one level—the surface that is, the child is dead, but Jesus wants to strengthen their faith—to see what may be beyond their human eyes.

   In the second story of the woman with the unusual blood flow, he is again working at addressing and strengthening the peoples’ faith. The woman with the physical condition already believes in something she can’t explain—”if I can only touch him,” I will be healed, and she believes in the miracle the moment it happens! 

   Additionally, I believe Jesus is trying to uplift the injustice that women face in his society by the mere fact of how they happened to have been born, and as such, he cares for, touches and heals females who suffer not only physically, but emotionally, and spiritually by the lack of equal justice in their world that doesn’t even name them! These are acts he wouldn’t have to do in his society, but then we know that he is always about, “doing something new!”

   Edward Foley, Capuchin friar, is well-known in  his book, From Age to Age: How Christians Have Celebrated the Eucharist for addressing Jesus’ desire that all would be treated equally, especially when speaking of who was welcomed in the temple.  As we know, women and children were relegated to a separate section apart from the men, and women experiencing any blood flow weren’t allowed at all along with anyone having any type of illness.  Jesus, Foley says, “took the meal to the hillside where everyone was welcome!”

   We can hardly miss the connection today to the hierarchical rules and regulations about who can present to receive the Eucharist.  It must be remembered that the invitation to receive the Eucharist does not ultimately come from the clergy, but from God, thus it is not the responsibility of humans to decide who is worthy or acceptable! That is why we women priests hold up the bread before it is received by all and say, “This is the Body of Christ, how blessed are we who are called to this table!” instead of, in the traditional Church we hear, “O Lord I am not worthy to receive you, but only say the word and I will be healed!”  The difference in the two statements seems to be that, in the 1^st, we receive with “gratitude,” rather than in the 2^nd, our stance is more about “shame.”

   In conclusion friends, I would direct us back to the Wisdom writer in the 1^st reading who said so well  that, “God created all things to be alive…wholesome,” and that each, could, should experience, justice.  Jesus often addressed “fear” in his ministry, saying, “Don’t be afraid, just trust, and believe.”  Our brother Jesus wants us to live and work in our world in like fashion, dispelling fear and shame, uplifting justice for all—touching and healing our world as he did his.  Jesus’ primary mission in our world was to make clear that his, and our “God’s goodness,” is as the psalmist says today, “for a lifetime.”  Our mission, like his, in our world, can be no less—or as Anglican Bishop John Shelby Spong is fond of saying, “over-the-top-love” for all, to the best of our ability.  Amen?  Amen!