My friends, as I indicated in the bulletin for this week, the tone of today’s readings is somewhat “threatening,” but that we can still, “hope,” because that seemingly, threatening tone is basically calling us to become our best.  Our God, through Jesus, and the other prophets—today, Isaiah, is asking, as any good parent would, that we will live our lives in “fullness”—not just for ourselves, but for others too.  And when we are in need of “reprimand,” God, as any good parent, will give it.

   The truth is my friends, the message of these readings is something that we truly, “have to get right!”  Our brother Jesus, probably more than any other spiritual being living out their human experience, realized how living in “fullness,” can, at times, be most difficult.  He says in today’s gospel from Luke, “try to come in through the narrow door.”  To me, this simply says, that being our best will not be easy. It won’t be easy because sometimes the very people that we are called to love, drive us absolutely, crazy! 

   Jesus our brother, came among us to show us the way, the truth, and that which would give us true life.  Humanity’s basic condition is to take care of ourselves.  Now this is not to say that we aren’t capable of more—only that when tired, discouraged, frustrated, or simply selfish, caring for ourselves is the most natural and easiest thing to do. 

   Yet, our brother Jesus lets us know that one day the tally will be added up and those who have been last for most of their lives, will then be brought to the front of the line and the opposite is true as well.

   Now, I am not saying that you should be “just” with the gifts in this life because it will pay off in the end, even if this may be the case—no; only that you will be living up to what is best in humanity and as a spiritual sister or brother of Jesus.  And for me, at least, this is a more satisfying way to live. 

   Isaiah furthers the message that our God truly wants us to get when he says, “I am coming to gather the nations of every language.”  The psalmist too, in 117 tells us to, “Go out to all the world and tell the Good News.”  And the writer to the Hebrews seals the deal.  “We are [all] God’s children.” 

   Now, you will notice that there is no exclusion in any of the quoted passages above.  If our God does not exclude, why do we who claim to be religious or spiritual in any way?  Why does our Catholic church, in its hierarchy claim to be, “the one true Church” when our inclusive God showed the Divine Face not only to us, in Jesus, but to the followers of Buddha, Mohammed, and the Great Spirit, to name just a few?  Perhaps it might be because we have been satisfied to shape our God in too small of a box. 

   Why do we as a Church, in our hierarchy teach that “only certain body parts,” designate a call to service at our altars, to preach the Word, or to give pastoral mercy and care through the sacraments of our Church?  Why does this same hierarchy claim that “love is love” and “commitment in marriage” is only valid for heterosexual couples?  Why does the hierarchical Church teach us to mistrust and deny the sexual identity that people claim for themselves when our God made the differences to show the expansiveness of our great God?  The writer to the Hebrews seems to give us a piece of the hurtful truth, saying that, “suffering [will be] part of [our] training. To me, this says, we must rise above our human tendency to be, “black and white” when our God loves in technicolor. 

   Friends, I would like to end these thoughts by sharing parts of an article included in Sojourner Magazine this week by Adam Russell Taylor, entitled, Offering Lament and Thanksgiving for the Inflation Reduction Act.  It struck me, as I feel it did the author, that the Congress was truly capable of so much more in face of the fact that nearly 9 in 10 claims to be Christian and voted against even the pared-down measures from the original, Build Back Better initiative of the Biden administration. 

   So, the bitter and the sweet.  Because I choose to “look up” more than, “look down,” as a rule, first the “sweet:” the bill that passed includes the largest investment Congress has passed to date to combat climate change, it will lower health care and drug costs, and this bill will be paid for by taxing large corporations and wealthy individuals to pay closer to their fair share. 

“The bitter:” In order to get the above, much of the vision of the original bill had to be cut out—a vision significantly shaped by the Congressional Black Caucus, creating an economy in which all American families would better be able to flourish—such things as renewing the Child Tax Credit, medical leave, child care, pre-K education, housing assistance, maternal health and more. 

   And Jesus’ words must yet again ring for those in positions of leadership in Congress, “the last will [one day] be first!”  and we must remember that the opposite is true as well!  It seems to have always been so and thus, the lament.  The author tells us too, to be thankful for the good this Congress did manage to give us. 

   My personal prayer is that we would, as a country care as much for the down-trodden among us as we do for those with enough—that seems to be the message of today’s Scriptures and one that this Congress take seriously if they continue to claim, “Christianity” in their lives.  Amen?  Amen!

Dear Friends, 

As you know we met on the farm for our annual day to remember Mary Magdala and all women. Our misty morning drove us into the house for Mass but we were able to eat outdoors afterward. Nineteen of us enjoyed this gathering and we learned more of the story of this wonderful woman, Mary Magdala! Thanks to all who could make it and blessings to all others who for one reason or another could not be with us. 

Peace and love, 

Pastor Kathy

__________________________________________________________________________________________

   My friends, looking back, this appears to be our 11^th Mary of Magdala celebration!  We started in 2010, two years after we became a parish, and we missed only 2015, when Robert and I were gone to Alaska and 2020 when in lockdown due to COVID. So, what have we learned in these years? 

   First and foremost, women theologians, primarily, and some male historians and authors, have uncovered the truth about this “Mary.”  Unlike we all learned originally, she was not a prostitute that Jesus saved, but in actuality, she was a prophet and a priest, in the sense that any man was a prophet and a priest at the time she lived! But probably the most enduring character trait of this “Mary” was that she was a most loyal friend and follower of Jesus of Nazareth. 

   Over the years, at these gatherings where we have attempted to reclaim her true identity, I have shared some of our sorry Church history that let us know that a certain pope, Gregory by name, in the 6^th century, took it upon himself to, “throw,” for lack of a better word, all the “Mary’s” mentioned in Scripture, except for Jesus’ mother into a composite that reflected one character trait, and one trait alone—that of “a sinful woman,” –a prostitute, and we know that women who are prostitutes do that all by themselves! Right?!     But more so, that naming of the “Mary’s” incorrectly is the greater sin as it took from them their integrity, their honor, and any reason to take them, and by extension, any woman, seriously.  And for us in present times, this is most important in making the case for women being ordained in our Church.

   These celebrations then are meant to set the record straight!   And we need to do this because the Church belongs to women as well as men and because women have gifts to give our Church in the unique way that women do this, that our Church so badly needs today.  And believe it or not, men in our Church would be so much better because of it too—when truth is told, all is better, no matter which issue we are discussing! This is why I always open up my homilies to all of you because the Spirit of our brother Jesus speaks to your hearts, as to mine, when the Scriptures are proclaimed and we are all better, when all the voices are heard.

   Recently, I came upon some new, exciting exegesis—study of ancient texts concerning our “Mary of Magdala” that I wanted to share today.  I learned this “news” to me, through a friend who shared a 40-minute talk given by Christian author, Diane Butler Bass, who has several books to her credit, Freeing Jesus, Christianity after Religion, Christianity for the Rest of Us, and more. I won’t share all that she said in this talk, but if you are interested in hearing it in its entirety; I would be happy to share it with you. 

   But for today—just the highlights:  1) It seems that in early maps in the time of Jesus, a town or city of “Magdala” cannot be located—the place that our “Mary” is said to be from.  2) New study done in the last several years (2017) by Elizabeth Schrader, then a master’s candidate in New Testament, studying the Greek, Aramaic, and Coptic languages, made a most interesting discovery! She felt called to “know” more about Mary of Magdala and that was why she pursued the Masters in New Testament degree. 

   In her study, she received access to the earliest texts available and in one such text, Papyrus 66, from approximately 200 A.D., she discovered evidence that in the gospel of John, chapter 11, in the story of Mary, Martha and Lazarus, that “Martha” may have been an addition to the story.  A similar story from the gospel of Luke, chapter 10: 38-42 was used recently for the 16^th Sunday in Ordinary Time. Now, all of us assume that the two stories are the same and about, Mary, Martha, and Lazarus.  Evidence now shows that this is not the case and here is why. 

   The first line from the Luke selection says it all: “Jesus entered a village where a woman named Martha welcomed him to her home.”  Now, what should have jumped out for all of us was the fact that Martha would not have had a home as women did not own property if they had a father, brother or husband.  The reading goes on— “she had a sister named Mary.”  No mention is made of a brother Lazarus in this selection. 

   Let’s go back to Chapter 11 of the gospel of John. What Elizabeth Schrader discovered in the earliest text of John, Papyrus 66, is that it had been changed by someone in the 4^th Century.  “Mary” in the Greek appears like “Maria” in English.  The “i” in Maria is the Greek letter, “iota.”  Upon close inspection, as Elizabeth zoomed in on the text, she discovered that the “i” was changed to “th” or “theda” in the Greek, giving us “Martha” instead of “Mary.”  Thus, this text was changed from Lazarus having one sister, “Mary,” to two sisters, Mary, and Martha.  Why was this done?

     Elizabeth Schrader makes the case that this was a way to solve an early Church “problem” of leadership—was it Peter or Mary, or perhaps both, who were called by Jesus to lead?  Think what this would mean if the men involved had recognized, as did Jesus, Mary’s ability to lead! Just as Pope Gregory had found it advantageous to “throw” all the Mary’s into a composite that was “unflattering,” basically, silencing them, and their valuable work in the Church, someone in the 4^th Century tried to do the same. 

   Further study by Elizabeth Schrader demonstrated clearly that the John text, in its earliest form had Lazarus having one sister, Mary and that she, and not Martha was the one who proclaimed that, “Jesus was the Christ, come into the world” –a text similar to the account in the gospel of Matthew where Peter proclaims the same belief.  You will recall that Jesus then called Peter, “the Rock.” 

   Even Tertullian, Church father from the 2^nd century, labeled by Diane Butler Bass as one of the most misogynist of his time, stated that Lazarus had one sister and that was, Mary.  So what are we to make of this? 

   We get some help if we go back to our key figure of today’s celebration, “Mary of Magdala.” Earlier I stated that at the time of Jesus, there was no town or city of “Magdala.”  So why do we assume that the two words written together mean that “Magdala” was where our Mary was from? 

   The women wanting to understand this have dug deeper and found that, “magdala” in the Greek, rather than a “place” was in fact, “a title.”  In the Greek, “magdala” means, “tower,” thus, Mary the Tower, and she was most likely given this title, it is thought, because of her faith— “her tower of faith.”  It would seem that our celebration going forward will need a new name!

    It is thought then by many trying to unearth the truth, a few things:  1) The Luke story and the John story are about two different groups of people—John’s story is about Lazarus and his sister Mary who proclaims just like Peter in the gospel of Matthew that, “Jesus is the Christ.”  2) It is thought that this “Mary” is the Mary we celebrate today—not Mary from Magdala, but Mary, the Tower (of faith) by which we can all stand!  3) It is this same Mary, formerly “Mary of Magdala,” now reclaimed as “Mary the Tower of Faith,” who was faithful to the end, at the cross, and who was the first to witness the Resurrection, and proclaim it to the men.

   Now, I think you can see that if Mary was lifted up as a “Tower of Faith” –given this title because of her actions following Jesus, this will be a problem for the men in the years after Jesus lived who wanted to control the narrative and uplift Peter’s confession over Mary’s –which again, we must remember, was the same! 

   And uplifting Peter and downplaying Mary was accomplished by blending the John and Luke texts to be a nice story about one family, Martha, Mary, and Lazarus and can more easily recede into history.  If “Martha” confesses that Jesus is the Christ and Mary is seen as an impressionable, starry-eyed, young woman who merely sits at Jesus’ feet, we cannot easily “connect the dots” to see Mary instead as a strong, prophetic, and courageous woman who assisted Jesus throughout his ministry, followed him to the cross and witnessed the Resurrection. Nor can we clearly see Mary, or any woman called by our brother, Jesus, the Christ, as natural-born leaders, called to serve at our altars, because they too image God every bit as clearly as any man does!

  Thinking about the changing of Scripture to accommodate men makes me believe even more firmly in Scripture scholar, Sandra Schneider’s statement that, “Scripture was written by men, about men and for men!”

   Now if you are still skeptical about this news, I would want you to know that Elizabeth Schrader wrote her master’s dissertation on her research of the true Mary, and it was picked up by Harvard Divinity School and a professional article followed.  Additionally, Nestle Aland Theology Group in Germany, known for being very “stuffy” read Schrader’s work and simply said, “We might need to change something here.”

   So, there you have it friends, you know what I know, and I would simply conclude by sharing Diane Butler Bass’ reaction to her friend, Elizabeth Schrader’s research when she first shared it with her over coffee at Starbucks.  Diane said that she knew instinctively, upon hearing her friend’s words, that she was hearing the truth!”  And she cried for having had this knowledge kept from her and all women so long. And this was the same reaction of many women when they first saw a woman presiding at the altar—I know it was mine because instinctively, we all knew it was right and true. 

   And friends, I too believe this new exegesis to be so, whether the Scripture texts are ever changed or not, as it has been my experience and that of many other women called to ordination within our Church that our God, shown so beautifully to the world in the person of Jesus of Nazareth, one who was constantly turning things on their heads, had no problem seeing women as the image of the divine, nor should we!

   Finally, think what our Church could be if, rather than, “built on Peter the Rock,” which seems to be more about him and others following him, doing their bidding, it was built upon, Mary, the Tower of Faith and all, each of us standing with her.  Amen? Amen!